Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Comment

Detention Centre Outrage: The UK’s Discrimination Against Non-Citizens

Immigration Covid

Guest contributor Harriet Morphy-Morris comments on the decried methods the UK government has utilised in handling immigration cases during Covid-19. 

The UK government continues ignoring the rights of non-UK citizens by placing thousands of people in immigration detention centres during the Covid-19 pandemic. Over 19,000 people were placed in detention during the first peak of the crisis, despite having insufficient measures in place to protect the health of inmates and staff. The government knew about the lack of resources to effectively prevent the spread of the virus in crowded detention centres and yet, they placed thousands of people there. 

In October hundreds of inmates were left isolated in Scotland’s Dungavel detention centre after a Covid outbreak. Inhumane living conditions including overcrowding and unsanitary facilities contributed to the spread of the virus. Speaking on the issue, human rights lawyer Aemer Anwar said the Home Office has a history of failing to provide support to those with medical conditions. Dungavel provided no welfare or dignity to the detainees. 

This has sparked calls for the permanent closure of what is described by many as “unjust and ineffective” immigration facilities. The lack of safeguarding and a process that prioritises quick administration of detainees’ physical and mental welfare is defined by many as a breach of human rights. Detention Action, who provide support to those held in immigration detention, have highlighted that despite an outcry to close detention centres, there are still hundreds of people being placed in unsanitary warehouses with no Covid testing facilities. More than half of those are considered highly vulnerable and likely to be taken extremely ill with symptoms.

The Home Secretary has the power to detain people for a short period of time. However, this traumatic experience is being used by the government as an administrative “fast track” to speed up applications. The UK holds people in centres whilst they wait for scheduled deportation. This controversial “last resort” procedure has no judicial oversight, meaning the decision to detain someone does not need approval from a judge. 

Unlike other European countries, the UK has no set limit on how long they can hold such individuals. The government states that the process is used rarely; however, thousands of people are held for long periods of time each year. Data obtained from the Migration Observatory showed 24,000 people were forced into detention in 2019, and a third of these people were held for longer than 28 days. Another report by The Guardian further highlights the shocking amount of unlawful detentions. In 2018, the government had to pay £13.8 million to more than 500 people who were wrongly detained, many of whom had lived in the UK since birth or childhood. Between 2012 and 2017 the government forked out £21 million in compensation.

Along with the emotional trauma this process has on people and their families, there have been many recorded cases of abuse. Brook House immigration removal centre near Gatwick Airport was exposed by Panorama after footage revealed physical and emotional bullying on-site. An inquiry by Parliament UK revealed that the existing Adults at Risk Policy put in place to protect the wellbeing of detainees is not effective. Rule 35, which is intended to act as a safeguard, is recorded to have failed across multiple sites. 

Since the start of the Covid-19 pandemic through into our second lockdown, thousands of people have signed petitions to close detention centres and prevent unnecessary deaths.

The need for immigration is understood. During a pandemic which causes  great hardships across the world, people’s health should be a priority. Poor conditions at many immigration centres are causing atrocities, which is why those should be temporarily closed.

Harriet Morphy-Morris writes for immigrationnews.co.uk, a media platform that helps to raise awareness about migrant injustices and news around the world.

About the author

Latest

KCLSU & Societies

The Board of Trustees’ decision taken last month will take effect on 1 August 2026, with no plans to revisit the changes. King’s College...

Comment

Comment Editor Biraj Khadka argues that Manchester’s musical past holds lessons for Britain’s current political moment. It’s not coming home after all. Regardless, in...

Photo taken by Elaine Skidmore, inside of The Royal London Hospital Photo taken by Elaine Skidmore, inside of The Royal London Hospital

Culture

Culture Editor Thomas Deakin shares his experience of brain surgery, explaining how it equipped him with a fresh perspective on studying and a toolkit...

Photo taken by Thomas Deakin, Main Gallery of The Museum of Youth Culture, Camden Photo taken by Thomas Deakin, Main Gallery of The Museum of Youth Culture, Camden

Culture

Culture Editor Thomas Deakin writes about the recent opening of the Museum of Youth Culture’s first permanent space in Camden and its importance as...

Culture

Culture Editor Sabrina Hau examines the changing dynamics between print and digital media industries through the lens of the new Devil Wears Prada 2...

Students

A group of about 10 students gathered yesterday at 1pm in front of the Strand Building “in solidarity with students in the US”, and...

Students

On Thursday, King’s College London (KCL) academic Dr Rachael Kent won a £1.5 billion case against U.S tech giant Apple. Dr Kent, under the...

Culture

Culture editor and staff writer Livia Bull reviews the FLINTA* pop up bar 'La Monocle'.

Culture

Sex-appeal has given way to a ken-doll smooth portrayal of love and lust in the cinema. When did we condemn the silver screen to...