Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Comment

A look back at KCLSU and Israel-Palestine: Dangerously Biased?

Roar writer and CAMERA on Campus fellow Saul Levene on his view regarding last year’s KCLSU Officers statement on the Palestine-Israel conflict.

Commenting on the conflict in Israel and Gaza in May, the officers of the King’s College London Student Union issued a statement with dangerously biased and inaccurate views of what transpired.  

The statement sided entirely with the people of Palestine, while inaccurately reporting forced evictions of families in Sheikh Jarrah and Israeli brutality. Such statements that attempt to simplify the immensely complicated Palestine-Israeli conflict only lead to further hate.

This wording omits the nuanced reality of these events including that the issue within Sheikh Jarrah was a property dispute, and important details such as how the legal rights to the property in Sheikh Jarrah are in Jewish possession after their purchase in 1876 were ignored. Time and again, courts have found legal rights to the property to lie with its Jewish owners, a fact often excluded from the record. 

When Jordan illegally occupied East Jerusalem, the Jews living there were ethnically cleansed to make room for ethnically Arab people. After the war in 1967 Israel recaptured eastern Jerusalem, the legal owners were granted the right to lease the accommodation. Furthermore, Palestinian lawyers in 1982 admitted openly to the Jewish ownership of the land. After years of non-payment of rent, the owners legitimately sought justice through the courts and propagandists seized the opportunity to defame Israel and claim the incident was an example of ethnic cleansing.  

What this sloganistic, simplistic, and biased language does is reduce highly complex situations to antisemitic propaganda. Libels of “forced eviction”, “genocide” and “ethnic cleansing” are not based on fact or understanding; they’re based on a desire to incite hatred against the Israeli government irrelevant of the facts on the ground.  

The SU officers also included loaded and biased language such as the “brutal violence” of the Israeli attacks while conveniently ignoring the thousands of lethal rockets aimed at civilian areas in Israel. The Israeli response is just that – a response to the war crime of targeting Israeli civilians. 

The statement also contains blatant falsehoods. They claim that Israel committed “continued indiscriminate bombing of Gaza which has targeted schools, hospitals and stores’ with ‘over 200 civilian deaths”. In reality, the reason for the civilian casualties in Gaza is due to Hamas’ use of human shields as a propaganda tool. Israel consistently targeted sites of weapon stockpiles hidden in civilian areas and took precautions to avoid civilian areas, even calling off strikes when children were occupying a military target. The IDF records military intelligence headquarters installed next to a kindergarten, weapons depots placed in various houses and apartment buildings as well as weapons factories situated in the heart of densely populated civilian areas. 

Israel operates with unprecedented restraint in this area compared to other armed forces. In 1991, the UN defended the killing of 100 Somali civilians in an attack with the claim that “Everyone on the ground in the vicinity was a combatant, because they meant to do us harm.” Israel’s restraint in this area is unprecedented – choosing to call off attacks because of the presence of non-combatants, unlike the UN. Criticisms of Israel for ‘indiscriminate violence’ is either holding Israel to a standard that is not applied to any other state in the world or is painfully ignorant of the lengths Israel goes to avoid unnecessary casualties.  

The SU officers also use references like Al-Jazeera, widely known to be biased against Israel and publish stories that are completely fabricated for the sake of influencing public opinion. It’s certainly telling when our elected Student Officers choose to rely on the opinion of an antisemitic, propagandist organisation that hosts such erudite opinions as one of their anchors, Ghada Oueiss, that openly promotes antisemitic conspiracy theories on Twitter.

Their extreme bias is further shown through the links they posted at the bottom of the statement for the sake of “education”. These contained links to biased movements accused by Israeli institutions of using antisemitic jargon, such as Students for Justice for Palestine. The SJP, for instance, are backed primarily by “founders, financial patrons and ideological supporters who have been connected to Islamist terror organizations such as Hamas, Hezbollah, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and the Marxist Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP)”.

More importantly, the SU officers described the situation using sweeping slogans and anti-Israel libels such as “globally recognised apartheid” and “ethnic cleansing”. These claims are false and damaging. They are false because all citizens of Israel, regardless of ethnicity, are afforded full civil rights within the state of Israel, as noted by comparative law constitutional Arab-Israeli scholar Mohammad Wattad. To be clear, over 20% of Israel’s population are ethnically Arab, many of whom identify as Palestinian.  

These claims of inequality and apartheid, besides being false, are damaging, as they lead directly to antisemitic abuse and violence. As Brandeis University and AMCHA research has found, there is a direct correlation between the proliferation of BDS activity and antisemitism on campuses with large Jewish student populations.   

This has never been so evident as it was last summer. Antisemitism skyrocketed on all online platforms and in-person school-related antisemitic attacks increased by a rise of 491% in May compared to the first six months of 2020.  

This rhetoric that the SU is espousing leads directly to groups of individuals driving through Jewish areas and the City of London crying to “rape Jewish daughters” in attempts to intimidate Jews due to their connection with Israel.   

The Student Union should not be espousing political claims that inevitably ostracise, marginalise and endanger any groups of students. Relying on hate-centred news outlets, choosing to “educate” KCL students with biased anti-Israel libels and baseless slogans all point to the extreme bias and illegitimacy of this statement from last years Student Officers.

While the SU statement has been taken down following the appointment of our current Officers’ team, the original piece still, in my mind, contributes to a harmful culture. Our representatives should not be fostering falsehoods and propaganda, or making campus a space for hatred.

Editors’ Note, 18.01.2022: This article has been edited to correct for a factual inaccuracy regarding the removal of the KCLSU statement in question.

Latest

Comment

News Editor Daisy Eastlake looks into the British accent divide and what it means for social mobility within the UK. Like many university students,...

Culture

Staff writer Charlotte Galea takes a look at the history of the building which neighbours the King’s College London Strand Campus. Somerset House has...

Comment

Staff writer Au Young Yiu Wai examines the methods Heathrow Airport could adopt to become a more student friendly space. Amidst the flurry of...

KCLSU & Societies

Turnout-related drops in drink prices at the Vault and Guy’s Bar during the 2024 King’s College London Students’ Union (KCLSU’s) elections led to total...

Events

On March 13, 2024, the KCL Politics Society hosted the second iteration of its Bi-Annual Political Debate on Strand Campus. Staff Writer Alice Fu...

Events

This evening the society announced the cancellation of a panel event after substantial backlash and plans for rallies reached a mass public audience. In...

Comment

Staff writer Alex Martin Astley discusses the different manners by which students can pursue action for a ceasefire in the Israeli-Gaza war and argues...

Comment

Staff Writer Leah Napier-Raikes argues that the death of Aaron Bushnell is the product of the increasingly apparent distance between the American people and...

Politics

Staff Writer Charley Dennis argues that the ICJ’s ruling on Israel is a crucial development and examines whether it will bring an end to...