Staff Writer Meera Mohanraj reflects on Mamdani’s controversial win and what it means for the Democratic Party.
Zohran Mamdani is New York’s City first Muslim mayor, and in many ways, the first millennial mayor, but it is his brand of democratic socialism which is proving divisive from the dominant rhetoric at the helm of the Democratic party.
In June, Mamdani won the primary with a 56.4% majority to become the Democratic nominee for mayor. With a campaign that promised lower rent, an increased subway service and a successful fare-free bus pilot; his policies addressed the real issue of the city: the cost of living.
He has mobilised the masses and particularly appealed to young voters with those aged 18 to 29 having the highest turnout in the primary of any age group (35.2%), double their turnout in 2021 (17.9%). Those who came of age amidst the era of Trumpism have for too long been presented with defeatist politics rather than real solutions.
In a New York City Democratic mayoral primary debate, all candidates were asked where they would visit as mayor. Former governor Andrew Cuomo promptly answered Israel whilst Mamdani affirmed he would stay in New York. It was an ostensibly simple promise to remain focused on his constituents. Simultaneously, Mamdani recognised that the working-class residents, of the most expensive city in the world, need a leader to address the problems on their doorstep. The New York City mayor has little influence over U.S foreign policy in the Middle East, nor will an alliance with Benjamin Netanyahu aid in stabilising the rent or the housing nightmare.
Since Trump’s economic policy has made everyday life all the more costly, recent analysis shows that the prices of candy this Halloween is up 10.8% compared to last year. Whilst Trump is turning a blind eye to inflation, Mamdani re-evaluates the New York City Council’s spending. To fund his ambitions for a more affordable city, Mamdani proposed creating an additional tax bracket for New York City residents with income over $1 million, which would be taxed at 5.9%. Unsurprisingly, Cuomo argued that this will drive millionaires out of the city; clearly a dramatic decision just to escape the taxman.
US House minority leader Hakeem Jeffries only recently endorsed Mamdani as mayor, ending a four-month standoff. A welcome, if not late, gesture shows that the Democrats have shifted their lines and recognised that the ‘Mamdani effect’ is permeating culture and represents a genuine threat to the status quo. The status quo is deemed by Mamdani as ‘broken’, for burying working-class voices beneath corporations.
Having emerged victorious, the major test for Mamdani starts closer to home. Whilst his most threatening adversary yet is President Trump – who employed a red-scare tactic by labelling him a ‘communist’ – the more impenetrable enemy is the opposition within his own party. US Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer refused to reveal who he voted for, proving that Mamdani may face political barriers when it comes time to implement his manifesto.
His succinct solutions to city-wide issues like housing reclaims the values that Democrats have forgotten about: efficiency and quality of life. By outlining proposals to quickly reduce financial strains on the average New Yorker, productivity and welfare are being foregrounded and prioritised.
Time will tell whether Mamdani can deliver on his agenda. Mamdani’s campaign has proven that progressive politics does not simply need to be in opposition to the MAGA train, but can stand for positive action. Action prompting change. Constantly fighting Trump has stagnated the Democrats, with Mamdani invigorating a jaded population with hopes of an affordable new future. He acts in service of the people, not in opposition to a country preoccupied with the price of Halal food or Knicks tickets.
The Left must leverage the momentum that Mamdani has built to regain their lost traction. The reactionary politics that the Democrats have offered has disillusioned many. Following the 2024 presidential election, a poll revealed that nearly a third of young people are “checked out” of a democracy that has not served them well or met their needs. By prioritising locals and validating their concerns, through the implementation of effective policies, the youth of America will be re-energised.
