Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Comment

Rewriting the past is an insult to those who gave their lives

While commemorating the centenary of World War One, we must be on guard against those who wish to rewrite history.

 

Like most people with any semblance of rational thought, I idolise the great luminary of our age: Stephen Fry. Imagine my disappointment, therefore, to discover in a clip from QI this appalling quote from Mr Fry on the subject of Britain defeating Germany in World War One: “We pretty much spanked their botties.”

Handling it with considerably more sangfroid than I could possibly have mustered, David Mitchell simply replied: “After only four years of carnage.”

The centenary of the great war this year will almost certainly be accompanied by an ever increasing chorus of this sort of self-applauding nonsense. We have already had the Prime Minister denigrate this solemn occasion by comparing it to the Jubilee and Royal wedding. Jeremy Paxman, never afraid to call out a politician, responded by giving the Prime Minister a sound (if, unfortunately, metaphorical) rap on the knuckles, and rightly so. This plauditory reaction to one of the bloodiest conflicts in global history is absurd.

As the last few people to have lived through those dark days die, it has become progressively easier to resell the First World War as a great victory against those precocious and uppity Germans. Michael Gove claimed in an article in the Daily Mail earlier this month that World War One was “a just war”, while Boris Johnson argued that the war was “overwhelmingly the result of German expansionism and aggression“.

This type of thinking ignores Britain’s own aggressive imperial expansionism in Africa and the colonial rivalries that brought war to Europe. Censuring Germany’s desire to expand its territory in this way seems to be an attempt to exculpate our own ancestors of the self-aggrandising impulse that gave birth to colonial competition and arms races, and built up tensions between the European powers.

The “myths” propagated by the “left-wing academics” whom Gove blames for misinterpreting the war have more reality about them than it is comfortable for us to admit. The Versailles treaty attempted to cleanse the French and British of responsibility for the Great War, but blaming only the Germans, when the first declaration of war was by Austria-Hungary, is simply ridiculous. More importantly, the European alliance system that allowed a relatively minor issue in Serbia to escalate with such terrible consequences was the fault of all the great powers.

The suggestion that we won the First World War is equally ludicrous, and a claim that is meaningless in the broader context of history. We may have avoided the looming spectre of a Europe dominated by Germany, but this was accompanied by a decline in British influence and ended up leaving Europe even more unstable than it had been before the first man died on the Western Front. To claim that we won a war because we lost less than our enemy is just pathetic.

This year should be about commemorating the individual sacrifice and heroism of hundreds of thousands of our soldiers. It is also a chance to celebrate the achievements of the women who were essential to the war effort. Often overlooked, their contribution was essential to the war effort and helped to change attitudes about what women are able to achieve.

But to take pride in the hollow victory of World War One is akin to declaring ourselves king of the ashes, born only out of a shallow martial patriotism that insults the memory of the brave men who gave their lives.

Although the survivors of the Great War are now few in number, the literature and poetry their generation produced must be used to inform our perceptions of history and to gain a richer insight into those horrific events. Perhaps the next time Mr Gove feels the urge to tell our schoolchildren to take pride in our victory in the war, he should take heed of these words from the great poet Wilfred Owen:

“If in some smothering dreams you too could pace

Behind the wagon that we flung him in,
And watch the white eyes writhing in his face,
His hanging face, like a devil’s sick of sin;
If you could hear, at every jolt, the blood
Come gargling from the froth-corrupted lungs,
Obscene as cancer, bitter as the cud
Of vile, incurable sores on innocent tongues,
My friend, you would not tell with such high zest
To children ardent for some desperate glory,
The old Lie; Dulce et Decorum est
Pro patria mori.”

(It is sweet and proper to die for the fatherland)

About the author

Latest

Events

The Royal Society Summer Science Exhibition takes place annually and provides an opportunity to showcase research from universities and research institutions all over the...

Comment

Videographer Bella Steiner examines the effects of the recent earthquakes in Venezuela, spotlighting the government’s inability and hesitation to respond promptly, resulting in loss...

KCLSU & Societies

The Board of Trustees’ decision taken last month will take effect on 1 August 2026, with no plans to revisit the changes. King’s College...

Comment

Comment Editor Biraj Khadka argues that Manchester’s musical past holds lessons for Britain’s current political moment. It’s not coming home after all. Regardless, in...

Photo taken by Elaine Skidmore, inside of The Royal London Hospital Photo taken by Elaine Skidmore, inside of The Royal London Hospital

Culture

Culture Editor Thomas Deakin shares his experience of brain surgery, explaining how it equipped him with a fresh perspective on studying and a toolkit...

KCLSU & Societies

The Board of Trustees’ decision taken last month will take effect on 1 August 2026, with no plans to revisit the changes. King’s College...

Culture

Culture Editor Thomas Deakin writes about the recent opening of the Museum of Youth Culture’s first permanent space in Camden and its importance as...

Economy

Deputy Editor-in-Chief Lara Bevan-Shiraz reports on the Strand Group’s panel discussion on 8 July, featuring Angela Rayner, which critiqued patchy devolution thus far, pressing...

Comment

'Andy Burnham is my ninth prime minister; Tony Blair was my first.'