Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Culture

Review: X & Y, The Science Museum

By Dan Young and Dulcie Lee

Rogue sent two King’s students (Dulcie being the new Roar! Deputy Editor of Print) to go and see the scientific spectacle that is X & Y, bringing an audience perspective from a less scientific point of view.

 

The skeleton of a giant neon cube for the set, oversized white, flowing clothes, performers gliding around stage and existentialist dialogue. Usually, I would find it incredibly hard to appreciate such pretentious fluff.

However, the simple, minimalist-in-the-extreme set of the play X&Y, currently on show at the Science Museum, and the two characters, ‘X’ and ‘Y’, clinical and naive, worked. It was the mathematics that created the drama, the beauty and the story.

From the offset, mathematics was the tool of communication – mathematical sleight of hand was used to prove that one equals zero, which was done at such speed it easily threw most of the audience off course. But the rest of the mathematical ideas were remarkably easy to follow, effortlessly building in complexity with an entirely opposite fashion to boring, impenetrable school textbooks.

The play follows a naïve ‘variable’ called ‘X’ (Marcus du Sautoy). Functioning like a calculator, all he has ever known is the empty blue shape. His entire universe is only six feet across. Following the arrival of bubbly variable ‘Y’ (Victoria Gould), they explore infinity, reality, paradox and existence with wonderful child-like curiosity.

As the play developed, wedged between the mathematics were brief flickers of emotion between ‘X’ and ‘Y’. The intermittent soppiness put a dampener on the pure maths, and was an unnecessary addition to already poignant themes. It felt as if the writers temporarily lost confidence in the story of the numbers, so pandered to the desires of those yet to be sold on the maths alone.

The play, although surreal from the start, intensified to an avant-garde peak when ‘Y’ broke the fourth wall. In response to a question posed by ‘X’, ‘Y’ announced directly to the audience: “None of this is real, we’re acting,” to which a few audience members offered a wave. In the next moment, ‘X’ and ‘Y’ were perched on chairs among the audience discussing the nature of reality.

The scene was as surreal as it was predictable, but stood behind me on a fold up chair was an eminent mathematician and Oxford professor, pretending to be a personified aspect of the subject he studies. “Why isn’t every mathematics teacher this cool?” I thought.

For the denouement, the two characters jumped on stage and tore off a belt of material from the set, wrapping it round their heads to demonstrate a Mobius strip. ‘Y’ drew on the similarities between mathematics and theatre: “In suggesting, we make something real.”

It was an inevitably ambitious aim to bring such advanced mathematical ideas to the stage, and it was brave to do so with a complete lack of conventional storytelling.

After a long applause the lights went up, the audience stretched and young teenagers spewed out into the foyer fizzing with ideas about high level mathematics. Surely that alone is evidence of its brilliant success.

 

And what did the Roar! Science Editor Durr-e-Maknoon Tariq think about the show?

As a Pharmacology student who does not have detailed knowledge of maths or physics, I found the play quite interesting and, mostly, easy to follow. In my opinion, the play gave out a message that all the concepts portrayed might be just that – mere concepts. They may not exist in reality, but that is what theatre does: it shows things that might not be real and may not exist in real life at all.

One of the very important ideas mentioned is ‘nothing’. According to the play, “nothing doesn’t exist”. Another very interesting concept mentioned is infinity. It has intrigued the human mind for centuries and yet we, as human beings, are not fully able to grasp it. Do we know if infinity really exists or is it all in our imagination?

Overall, I would say X & Y was a very interesting play to watch. Even if you don’t understand maths and physics, you’ll still understand the play. It will leave you thinking about the world and the universe, and make you ponder over the very ideas of reality and existence.

About the author

Related

Photo courtesy of Polly Symes

Culture

Staff Writer Polly Symes outlines three delicious and doable recipes that any incoming student fresher can conquer with confidence in their student kitchen. You’ve...

Sport

This piece was published in the September 2026 print edition of Roar News. A Sport for Everyone – Abyan “Supporting King’s sports teams competing...

Culture

Culture Editor Sabrina Hau investigates the rise of ‘Chinamaxxing’ on social media and questions what happens when a culture becomes the internet’s latest aesthetic....

Sport

This piece was published in the September 2026 print edition of Roar News. Croatia thought they had done it. Deep into stoppage time against...

Culture

London could not be more ready for the cold, wet months ahead. When we began compiling this list, the trees in the local parks...

Print Editions

In January 2026, UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) announced budget cuts of up to 60% to the Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC). Scientists...

Culture

Culture Editor Thomas Deakin writes about the King's Alumni's Theatre Society's production of 'The Crucible'.

Culture

Culture Editor Sabrina Hau explores The King’s Player’s rendition of ‘The Clean House’ written by Sarah Ruhl in the Anatomy Museum on September 27....

Science & Innovation

Head of Science Anoushka Sinha discusses the importance of science writing and communication. Roar’s Science & Innovation section is two years old; in both...