Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Comment

We should not care who ‘wins’ TIME’s Person of the Year

Person of the Year

Podcast Editor Sam Pennifold on the history and lack of moral decision-making in assigning the TIME’s Person of the Year title.

President- elect Joe Biden and Kamala Harris have been named dual Person of the Year after their US General Election win in November 2020, defeating incumbent President Donald Trump. Whilst a win for freedom, democracy and American Democrats in what TIME called a “historic election”, we are reminded of the abject stupidity of the TIME’s Person of the Year award.

TIME’s Person Of The Year is an antiquated measure of success or influence that hides behind impartiality to give a voice to those who actively put our society in danger and oppose progression. Whilst every time a controversial character is chosen as the cover star or even named as a runner-up, the editors are always quick to say that the award is not, in fact, an honour. But it seems hard to really understand that when the words “Person of the Year” are plastered over a powerful portrait of the recipient alongside multiple feature length interviews and opinion pieces.

The “award”, which was first handed out in 1927, is given to a person, group, symbol or idea and is chosen by the editors on the basis of their impact on the last year, “for better or worse”. Alongside it there are now awards for businessperson, entertainer and athlete of the year.

The TIME editors have never been afraid of controversy in the past when choosing the cover star for their annual edition. Some notable choices include: Adolf Hitler in 1938, Joseph Stalin in 1939 and 1942, William Westmoreland – commander of US forces in South Vietnam during the Vietnam War – in 1965, Vladimir Putin in 2007, and Donald Trump in 2016. Trump was also a runner up again this year.

Being chosen as the cover start is generally considered a great honour, as most are respectable people standing for strong values and ideals that are almost universally respected and seen as good, such as The Guardians group that won in 2018 to represent journalists prosecuted across the world in the pursuit of a free press, or Greta Thunberg for her environmental activism in 2019. The flip side of this is that, when controversial characters are chosen, it puts them within this group – offering them legitimacy and, if nothing else, massive publicity.

It seems the editors of TIME don’t really realise the power they hold to consistently promote serious issues and celebrate people who have made a positive difference. It is undeniable that Donald Trump in the last four years since 2016 has had perhaps an unmeasurable influence on the world, but it is hard to find truly positive examples of this awesome influence. It needs to be recognised that we can discuss and recognise the influence of people who have done bad things without offering them massive publicity for their acts and in a way that doesn’t legitimise them. We should never again see a Trump on the cover of a TIME’s Person Of the Year edition or have one named as a runner up.

What should be a celebration of Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, the first American women of colour to make the cover of the Person Of The Year edition, is tarred by Donald Trump being named as runner up alongside front-line workers and Dr Anthony Fauci. There is a clear odd one out. Unless the nature of the Person Of The Year title changes, we should all stop caring who wins TIME’s Person Of The Year.

Latest

News

Data published by the UK Government revealed that King’s College London (KCL) has shown minimal improvement in addressing its gender pay gap over the last...

News

King’s College London (KCL) announced the launch of a new undergraduate Mathematics degree designed to better prepare students for employment. The University has said...

News

Over 100 students from five different schools and around 50 King’s students have launched a campaign in collaboration with Citizens UK. The Campaign The...

News

New figures from the Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA) show that the number of first-class degrees awarded by King’s College London (KCL) in 2023/24...

Comment

What a Childhood Visit to Pakistan Taught Me About Grief, Hope, and the Stories We Still Need to Tell Arrival: A Country I Didn’t...

Comment

Staff Writer Benjamin Aston examines the costs, human and fiscal, of the Trump Administration’s domestic and international policy. The White House has faced uncertainty...

Comment

Staff writer Salomé Ichay discusses the diplomatic importance of the Houthis’ redesignation as a terrorist organisation. January 22nd 2025. Donald Trump, 47th president of...

Comment

Staff Writer Pola Janowska examines the growing influence of podcasts in political campaigning, analysing how Trump and Harris strategically leveraged long-form media appearances to...

Students

Staff writer Angela Alberti discusses the limits of free speech and considers the impact of new social media regulations on the topic. In recent...