Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?


‘As We See It’: A Series Passing for Neurodivergent

Photo by Jordan Cormack

Culture Editor Alex Blank on the new Amazon Original series “As We See It” and its portrayal of autism.

“As We See It” is a new Amazon Original series following the lives of three twenty-something roommates on the autism spectrum as they figure out life, relationships, work, and everything autistic people infamously struggle to navigate. The creator of the show, Jason Katims, stated that “all neurodiverse roles were cast with neurodiverse actors,” which enables the cast to “bring an emotional authenticity to their portrayals”.

Indeed, the depiction of autism is certainly more nuanced and complex than what audiences are used to, one reason for it being that the three characters are so different from each other. Jack (Rick Glassman) works for a publishing company, while dealing with his father’s new cancer diagnosis, as well as forming a new relationship. His main storyline centres around the need for financial independence, as he gets fired from his job for calling his boss an idiot, and his father’s cancer might almost seem as a stylistic device to make him face the reality of independent adulthood, while entering a romantic relationship forces him to examine his failures in “passing” for NT (neurotypical). While I loved witnessing his vulnerability as he admits his desire to pass for normal, I wish there could be more of it throughout the series, so that the audiences could see what lies beneath his ‘stiff’ or ‘unwelcoming’ exterior.

In contrast to Jack, Harrison (Albert Rutecki), who does not work, is afraid of leaving his room due to extreme sensory overload. As he befriends his upstairs neighbour, A.J. (Adan James Carrillo), what follows is a heartwarming covert bond formed between the two; they need to communicate through walkie talkies, as A.J.’s mother forbids his son to connect to Harrison. While I found the character of Harrison relatable in many ways, I couldn’t help but get angry at how the show put him in the position of a victim at almost every turn, and he is frequently portrayed through the lens of the side characters who call him “slow”. The way characters are treated by others affects how the audience perceives them, and the reason why Harrison might not be able to escape his childishness is precisely because everyone around him treats him like a child.

The third character, Violet, is a rare portrayal of a woman on the spectrum. She works at Arby’s, and has a desperate and deep need of connection, which is also a depiction of the extremity of special interests. For Violet, these two go hand in hand, as her need for connection mixed with the desire to be normal leave her obsessed with finding a partner and losing her virginity. She eventually ends up taken advantage of by a guy she’s infatuated with, and she loses a job over it. As glad as I was to see an autistic woman on screen, many of her behaviours – such as meltdowns, and communication or attachment issues – were left unexplained, and it might be easy for some NTs to misread her instead of truly understanding why she is struggling so much. This is intensified by the way her brother treats her. Though he claims he is overprotective for her own good, I don’t think taking her phone away and forbidding her from joining dating apps contributes to the much needed narrative of encouraging autistics to take agency of our life on our own terms. What Violet needs help with is realising that she does not need to be “normal”; and although her aide Mandy reassures her that being used and abused by a guy is very much normal (which bring a huge smile to Violet’s face), it only reinforces her determination to enter the “normal” sphere.

Seeing the eponymous “we” in the title of the series, I was hopeful that the ND (neurodivergent) experience would finally be depicted in all its wonderful extremes. However, despite a more nuanced representation than what we’re used to, as well as the amazing job done by the main cast, the sensibility of the series still leans too much towards the NT side. Most stereotypically tearful or “relatable” moments the audience might experience with regards to the show’s main characters are usually overruled by the NT narratives. Though it might be understandable that the creators want to balance the two out, somehow the heroes of the story are not the three main characters; rather, it’s those who take care of them, such as their siblings, parents, or aides. They’re the ones who get the sympathy vote for having cancer or being stuck in a love triangle, which are all well-trodden tropes that win audiences’ affection every time.

Jack is the one character who mentions “passing” for NT throughout the series, which is understandable given that the other two are an overweight man and a woman of colour, both belonging to groups often ostracised by society, whether autistic or not. But what bothers me most is the lack of trying to unpick what causes their struggles, their isolation, their habits and behaviours. When Violet is fired from her job for having a public meltdown, it is shown in a way that perpetuates the belief that autistic people need to learn to “behave themselves” to fit in the rest of society, corresponding to the teachings of the disturbing Applied Behavioural Analysis therapy, known for taking extreme measures to ensure autistic people are better equipped to exist in a neurotypical world without ever trying to change that world. What if, instead, we create a society that is more open and direct, where the individual on the spectrum does not always have to be the one expected to accommodate to everyone else’s needs – and if one fails, maybe the camera should look more deeply within them, instead of prioritising the other perspective, such as Jack’s father, who calls raising autistic children “a burden…but also a gift” – as if the main purpose of ND people is to make the NTs in their lives better.

“As We See It” is a step forward in some ways. It does many things right – the portrayal of sensory sensitivities, (mis)communication issues, the sheer helplessness of being looked through rather than seen. There are plenty of joyous moments in it too, such as the opening of episode 3, as the three roommates are preparing a disgusting bricolage of a drink (with a sprinkle of gummy bears on top) for Violet’s birthday; or as they lie in bed listening to Barbra Streisand’s “The Way We Were”. These are the moments that stress the importance of community, of having people out there who understand us – even if we don’t get along with them on a daily basis, as the three roommates certainly do not. However, what the show does wrong echoes many issues that are still pervasive, both in the media and in real life, such as the infantilisation of autistic people/characters; the well-meaning othering through putting NDs in opposition to the brave NTs in their life; as well as the everyday overt discrimination based mainly on a lack of willingness to understand. As happy as I am that the creators have made an effort to expand their cast and include ND actors, it is not enough if the framework around them is still largely neurotypical.

So, my question is: How can we depict the struggles and traumas experienced by so many autistic people in a truthful and sensitive way without infantilisation, or without alienating the NT audiences? How do we erase the us vs them binary, while still ensuring that autistic people can thrive just the way we are, without masking or forever asking: “Why does no one want me?” as Violet does so many times. Is there a way to raise awareness on a topic still so misunderstood without perpetuating the narrative that autism is a curse or a burden? I believe there may be. And I think “As We See It” could be a minor step in that direction, because of and despite its faults, as it shows us how much we still need to work to normalise the autistic experience, without needing to interlace every scene with a more palatable neurotypical one.


Protesters in favour of Ali as KCLSU president on Strand campus

KCLSU & Societies

Advait Joshi, who received the second most votes in the King’s College London Student Union (KCLSU) March elections, has refused to assume the office...


Staff writer Douglas Gibb scrutinizes the First-Past-The-Post system and its impact on true representative democracy in the wake of the recent UK elections. On...


Sports Editor Sam Lord reviews the defining moments and controversies from Euro 2024 in Germany. As English and Spanish fans return home from the...

A photo that shows the council chamber in Glasgow. A photo that shows the council chamber in Glasgow.


Staff Writer Grace Holloway reflects on the past few years of Scottish politics, and using the recent general election in the UK, offers some...

The International Space Station, photographed by ESA astronaut Paolo Nespoli following the undocking of his Soyuz-TMA on 23 May 2011. The International Space Station, photographed by ESA astronaut Paolo Nespoli following the undocking of his Soyuz-TMA on 23 May 2011.

Science & Technology

Staff writer Anoushka Sinha discusses the recent announcement of the decommissioning of the International Space Station. On 20 November 1998, the first segment of...


Staff Writer Grace Holloway reflects on the past few years of Scottish politics, and using the recent general election in the UK, offers some...


Staff Writers Aryan Pandla and Abhinav Poludasu reflect on the results from the recent election in India, considering its impact on Narendra Modi’s power...


Features editor Govhar Dadashova offers an in-depth overview of the upcoming European elections, examining the EU’s structure and who voters expect to see at...


Staff writer Ruth Otim reminds us of the conflict in Sudan, and the importance of the media in paying attention to international conflicts. I...